Friday, November 7, 2008

Three Great Movies

Homebirth/Waterbirth of Judah Darwin

Just beautiful!



Seen on Woman to Woman Childbirth Education, accompanied by a thoughtful post on What Does Natural Birth Sound Like?


Women Talk about Natural Birth

From the Real Women, Real Birth, Real Options blog:




Painless Childbirth Trailer

Trailer introducing Painless Childbirth by Giuditta Tornetta



I don't agree with everything in this trailer - I personally don't agree with implicitly or explicitly promising a woman a painless childbirth - but it's a beautiful trailer and offers a very interesting perspective. I'm excited to read the book.

Christina @ Birthing Your Baby
Independent Childbirth Classes for Central Maine

Labels: , , ,

posted by Christina Kennedy at 0 Comments

Friday, October 17, 2008

All Women Should Be Offered Midwife-led Care

This is a truly groundbreaking study: Midwife-led versus other models of care for childbearing women!

Background
Midwives are primary providers of care for childbearing women around the world. However, there is a lack of synthesised information to establish whether there are differences in morbidity and mortality, effectiveness and psychosocial outcomes between midwife-led and other models of care.

Objectives
To compare midwife-led models of care with other models of care for childbearing women and their infants.

Main results
We included 11trials (12,276 women). Women who had midwife-led models of care were less likely to experience antenatal hospitalisation, risk ratio (RR) 0.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81 to 0.99), the use of regional analgesia (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.91), episiotomy (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.88), and instrumental delivery (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.96) and were more likely to experience no intrapartum analgesia/anaesthesia (RR 1.16, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.29), spontaneous vaginal birth (RR 1.04, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.06), to feel in control during labour and childbirth (RR 1.74, 95% CI 1.32 to 2.30), attendance at birth by a known midwife (RR 7.84, 95% CI 4.15 to 14.81) and initiate breastfeeding (RR 1.35, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.76). In addition, women who were randomised to receive midwife-led care were less likely to experience fetal loss before 24 weeks' gestation (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.97), and their babies were more likely to have a shorter length of hospital stay (mean difference -2.00, 95% CI -2.15 to -1.85). There were no statistically significant differences between groups for overall fetal loss/neonatal death (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.00), or fetal loss/neonatal death of at least 24 weeks (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.53).

Authors' conclusions
All women should be offered midwife-led models of care and women should be encouraged to ask for this option.

Plain language summary
Midwife-led care confers benefits for pregnant women and their babies and is recommended.

In many parts of the world, midwives are the primary providers of care for childbearing women. Elsewhere it may be medical doctors or family physicians who have the main responsibility for care, or the responsibility may be shared. The underpinning philosophy of midwife-led care is normality and being cared for by a known and trusted midwife during labour. There is an emphasis on the natural ability of women to experience birth with minimum intervention. Some models of midwife-led care provide a service through a team of midwives sharing a caseload, often called 'team' midwifery. Another model is 'caseload midwifery', where the aim is to offer greater continuity of caregiver throughout the episode of care. Caseload midwifery aims to ensure that the woman receives all her care from one midwife or her/his practice partner. By contrast, medical-led models of care are where an obstetrician or family physician is primarily responsible for care. In shared-care models, responsibility is shared between different healthcare professionals.

The review of midwife-led care covered midwives providing care antenatally, during labour and postnatally. This was compared with models of medical-led care and shared care, and identified 11 trials, involving 12,276 women. Midwife-led care was associated with several benefits for mothers and babies, and had no identified adverse effects. The main benefits were a reduced risk of losing a baby before 24 weeks. Also during labour, there was a reduced use of regional analgesia, with fewer episiotomies or instrumental births. Midwife-led care also increased the woman's chance of being cared for in labour by a midwife she had got to know. It also increased the chance of a spontaneous vaginal birth and initiation of breastfeeding. In addition, midwife-led care led to more women feeling they were in control during labour. There was no difference in risk of a mother losing her baby after 24 weeks. The review concluded that all women should be offered midwife-led models of care.

Hatem M, Sandall J, Devane D, Soltani H, Gates S. Midwife-led versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD004667. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004667.pub2.

Finding a Midwife in Maine

There are many midwives currently working with families here in central Maine, both CNMs (Certified Nurse Midwives) who attend births in hospitals, and CPMs (Certified Professional Midwives0 who attend births at home. There is also one independent, free-standing birth center in Maine, staffed by midwives: The Birth House, in Bridgton.

Waterville Women's Care
Rights at Maine General, Waterville Campus
Waterville
877-7477

Central Maine Medical Center OB/GYN
Rights at CMMC
Lewiston
795-5770

Women's Health Associates
Rights at St. Mary's Hospital
Lewiston
777-4300

The Women's Center
Rights at Miles Memorial Hospital
Damariscotta
563-4700

Mid Coast Medical Group
Rights at Mid Coast Hospital
[This group appears to include several offices at different locations with different phone numbers.]
Brunswick
729-4996

Cathy Heffernan, CNM
Winthrop Family Practice
Rights at Maine General, Augusta Campus
Winthrop
377-2111

Heather Stamler, CPM
Vassalboro
873-5225

Midcoast Midwifery
Christine Yentes, CPM
Monroe
525-7740

Morning Star Midwifery
Donna Broderick, CPM
322-6464
Ellie Daniels, CPM
338-0708
Belfast

Mother Bloom Midwifery
Anna Fernandez, Traditional Homebirth Midwife
Blue Hill
326-4373

The Pregnancy Support Center
Jan Willson
Lewiston
777-3776

Northern Sun Family Health Care
Sarah Ackerly, ND, CPM Topsham
798-3993

Birch Moon Midwifery
Holly Arrends, CPM
Bath
522-6043

Casco Bay Midwifery
Schyla St. Laurent, CPM
Falmouth
797-7463

Open Circle Midwifery Services
Robin Doolittle, CPM
Deirdre Sulka/Meister, CPM
Greater Portland
838-2157

Sacopee Valley Birth Services
Brenda Surabian, CPM and
Lindsay Johnston, CPM
Parsonsfield
329-2111

To search for more midwives in Maine, go to the Midwives of Maine website or the Find a Midwife section of the American College of Nurse-Midwives website.

Christina @ Birthing Your Baby
Independent Childbirth Classes for Central Maine

Labels: , , , , ,

posted by Christina Kennedy at 0 Comments

Friday, October 10, 2008

USA Today Article on High-tech Interventions

High-tech Interventions Deliver Huge Childbirth Bill

I am so pleased to see this article in a mainstream newspaper! I do wonder about the title though... I would love to have seen something about how the costs don't produce healthier mothers and babies - that piece, to me, is the real story.

Here are two excerpts:
"Childbirth is the leading reason for hospitalization in the USA and one of the top reasons for outpatient visits, yet much maternity care consists of high-tech procedures that lack scientific evidence of benefit for most women, a report says today.

U.S. hospital charges for maternal and newborn care jumped from $79 billion in 2005 to $86 billion in 2006, the authors write. More than $2.5 billion a year is spent on unnecessary C-sections, which now represent nearly a third of all deliveries.
[The language in this sentence is unclear to me: it makes it sound like ALL of the Cesareans are unnecessary; clearly there are times when a Cesarean birth is appropriate use of technology. Maybe the "which now represent" refers to C-sections in general, not unnecessary ones in particular? Anyway...]

Reducing expensive techniques such as C-sections and increasing low-cost approaches such as childbirth assistants called doulas would improve mothers' and babies' health while cutting costs, the authors say.

. . .

"The University of Wisconsin's Douglas Laube, a former president of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, blames "very significant external forces" for the overuse of expensive technologies in maternity care.

"I don't like to admit it, but there are economic incentives" for doctors and hospitals to use the procedures, says Laube, who reviewed the new report before its release.

For example, some doctors might get bonuses for performing more labor inductions, which adds costs and increases the risk of C-sections, which, in turn, increase hospital profits because they require longer stays.

In addition, some doctors order unnecessary tests and procedures to protect against malpractice suits, Laube says."
It's important to remember that these higher prices DO NOT equal better care. The United States is not the standard-bearer for safety for mothers and babies. Using 2008 statistics, the United States (6.3/1000) currently ranks BEHIND the following countries for infant mortality rates: South Korea (5.94/1000), Cuba, Isle of Man, Italy, Taiwan, San Marino, Greece, Monaco, Ireland, Canada, Jersey, New Zealand, United Kingdom, Gibraltar, Portugal, Netherlands, Luxembourg, Guernsey, Liechtenstein, Australia, Belgium, Austria, Denmark, Slovenia, Macau, Isreal, Spain, Switzerland, Andorra, Germany, Czech Republic, Malta, Norway, Anguilla, Finland, France, Iceland, Hong Kong, Japan, Sweden, and Singapore (2.3/1000).

If you are interested in reading the report, it is available in pdf format, and a print copy can be obtained for free by emailing your contact information.

Milbank Report: Evidence-based Maternity Care
"What are top implications for policy makers, childbearing women and maternity professionals?"

Policymakers can play an important role in improving quality, health outcomes and resource use by addressing barriers to evidence-based maternity care. Recommendations for addressing barriers in the new report (PDF) fall in four areas: measuring performance and leveraging results, fixing perverse financial incentives, educating the key groups, and filling priority research gaps.

Childbearing women need to understand that maternity care that is routinely available often is not in the best interest of themselves and their babies. Pregnant women have the right and responsibility to become informed and make wise choices — for example, their choice of caregiver, birth setting and specific procedures, drugs and tests. Becoming informed and taking responsibility can be a big task — and can have very big pay-offs.

Health professionals need to recognize that usual ways of practicing frequently do not reflect the best evidence about safe, effective maternity care. The field of pregnancy and childbirth care ushered in the era of evidence-based practice: many hundreds of currently underutilized systematic reviews point the way to improved maternity practice and outcomes. The Evidence-Based Maternity Care report (PDF) identifies dozens of reviews that are relevant to care of a large segment of the maternal-newborn population. Engaging with the unparalleled move for health care quality and patient safety can improve professional performance and satisfaction and reduce risk of liability.

I am so excited to read this report and be able to include this information in my classes!

Christina @ Birthing Your Baby
Independent Childbirth Classes for Central Maine

Labels: , , , , ,

posted by Christina Kennedy at 0 Comments

Great Blog Posts

I've been reading some great blogs lately, and wanted to list the posts I've enjoyed/learned from the most. In no particular order:

The Profit of Pain Relief and All About Due Dates: Do Due Dates Mean Your Baby is Due? on Bellies and Babies

We Birth the Way We Live on Birth Change

Conscious Cesarean Birth on Making Birth Safe in the U.S.

This blog post includes a link to the full text of an amazing article, "The Natural Cesarean: A Woman-Centred Technique"
Abstract: Although much effort has gone into promoting early skin-to-skin contact and parental involvement at vaginal birth, caesarean birth remains entrenched in surgical and resuscitative rituals, which delay parental contact, impair maternal satisfaction and reduce breastfeeding. We describe a 'natural' approach that mimics the situation at vaginal birth by allowing (i) the parents to watch the birth of their child as active participants (ii) slow delivery with physiological autoresuscitation and (iii) the baby to be transferred directly onto the mother's chest for early skin-to-skin. Studies are required into methods of reforming caesarean section, the most common operation worldwide.

An FYI post on Breastfeeding and Codeine on the Motherwear blog

Where Have All the Flowers Gone on Real Women, Real Options, Real Birth discusses this article - "Doctor Won’t Make The Cut: Feeling Pressure from Hospital for More C-sections, She Leaves".

And from the same blog, Behind the Numbers: Surgical Birth in the USA.

Christina @ Birthing Your Baby
Independent Childbirth Classes for Central Maine

Labels: , ,

posted by Christina Kennedy at 0 Comments

Tuesday, October 7, 2008

Keeping a Journal during Pregnancy

There are a few things I really wish now that I had done during my two pregnancies and births. The first one is that I wish we'd taken more pictures of me/baby during pregnancy, labor, and right after the birth. I do have a few for each child, but looking back I really wish I had more.

The other thing is that I wish I'd kept a journal. Not necessarily a formal one; I do have one partially filled out in a sweet book my sisters gave me when I told them my husband & I would be trying to conceive. I treasure that book, but now I also wish I had more of a day to day or week to week informal record.

In fact I started off well during my first pregnancy, but that only lasted a few weeks; here's a few of the entries:
October 13: Your first Maine hike – “The Roost” near Gilead, Maine. We had perfect weather: beautiful blue skies and peak fall color. I had a difficult time hauling us up the mountain.

October 16: I had my first real dream about the baby: we were at the doctors having an ultrasound done & the baby was very clearly a boy!

October 17: Our first trip to the doctor’s to get blood drawn. It was strange to stare down at the paper and see, under diagnosis, “pregnancy”!

There are tons of online journal websites, some baby-oriented and others not. And there are lots of blank books, and baby "fill in the blank" journals at bookstores.

Here are a few additional resources:

The beautiful Birthing From Within Keepsake Journal.

In the September e-newsletter, Birthing From Within's founder, Pam England, discusses the three kinds of knowing as "primordial knowing", "modern knowing", and "knowing thyself" - this is a terrific article, and also a good starting place for considering why/how journaling can be a helpful part of birth preparation.

The Week Fifteen Lamaze e-newsletter also discusses journaling, "Focusing on your thoughts and daydreaming about motherhood can be a great way to slow down and relax. Even if you don’t think of yourself as a writer, journaling can help make your feelings, thoughts and concerns clearer to you. Furthermore, spending time thinking about your growing baby starts the important bonding process even before your baby is born." This article also includes some journal writing prompts.

I've never gotten into the whole scissors/layout/stickers thing, but this scrapbooking website has some good suggestions for a pregnancy scrapbook or journal.

More good ideas here.

Here is a link to Wondertime magazine's journal prompts for young children.

And this is an intersting blog post "Journaling Can Provoke an Oxytocin Response".

Finally, if you want to read other people's journals, you can look online at pregnancy blogs, or go book shopping. A few of my favorite books are Having Faith, by Sandra Steingraber, The Blue Jay's Dance, by Louise Erdrich, and Operating Instructions, by Anne Lamott.

Christina @ Birthing Your Baby
Independent Childbirth Classes for Central Maine

Labels: , ,

posted by Christina Kennedy at 0 Comments

Thursday, October 2, 2008

"Only When I Need To"

When an expectant mother asks her care provider for information about how often (s)he does inductions, cesareans, episiotomies, etc., one common response is:
"Only when I need to..." or
"Only when it's necessary..."

Are those good responses? The problem is that these answers are subjective; they're dependent on a particular doctor or midwife and his/her training, experience, and personal perspective - even someone's personality can come into play.

If all doctors and midwives provided individual care based on evidence, this type of answer would be more acceptable. However, other factors besides the individual and the evidence come into play in decision-making. I read in Pushed that "A 2006 analysis of ACOG obstetric recommendations found that only 23% were based on ‘good and consistent scientific evidence’ and that nearly half were based primarily on consensus and expert opinion, the weakest level of evidence" (Block 266).

To take it out of the medical field - because I believe subjectivity is part of being human, not just a factor in medical decisions:

I used to be a high school teacher, before my children were born. Whenever a parent would ask me "When do you call parents?", I would explain the particular situations that would elicit a phone call home. I could have said, "only when I need to", but I wouldn't have, because it does not truly answer the question. I do not think most parents would have accepted such an answer - nor should they.

Some teachers really hate calling parents, or don't want to spend the time to do it, so they may call only when a student is in danger of failing the class & it's mandated by school policy. Others may call when a student is in danger of failing, or is having behavior issues, to try to get parents to help turn the situation around. Others may call when a student is in danger of failing, for behavior issues, as well as for a sudden change in work quality, behavior, attendance etc. Finally, some teachers truly value home/school communication and make it a priority - those teachers may call for the previous reasons plus to congratulate students for a particular achievement. I'd bet all of those teachers would say they're calling when they "need to" - it's just that their opinion of "need to" is obviously very different.

Since "only when I need to" isn't a real answer, I believe a follow-up question is in order, even if it is hard to ask. Moms and dads deserve to understand the routines the care provider uses, so they can make an informed decision about whether or not that doctor or midwife is a good fit for them.

Some follow-up questions might include:
What percentage of births do you do ____________ for?
What specific situations do you use ____________________?
What other procedures/medications do you sometimes use instead & when/why?
I'm really hoping to avoid _________________, what can I do ahead of time or during the birth?

Besides, the response to the follow-up question can be very telling as well. Does the doctor or midwife become defensive or aggressive ("When did you go to medical school?")? Does he/she use scare tactics ("Well, you wouldn't want to tear from here... to here, would you?")? Is the answer still vague ("I don't really know how many ______________ I do... when the baby/mother needs it... sometimes" etc.)? It's a good thing to know sooner than later if your care provider responds to thoughtful questions in such an unprofessional way.

Or, does the care provider sit down and answer the question: "well, I don't usually do episiotomies, let's see - I've done three or four in the past year, when we needed to use the vacuum extractor to help mom push the baby out" or "for most first-time mothers, I do episiotomies. A clean cut heals better than a tear". Another example, "I'm comfortable with moms birthing in any position - I've caught babies with mom on hands/knees, using a birth stool, leaning on the back of the bed, in the water tub; many moms do seem to end up using the bed...; I offer suggestions sometimes, and would be happy to help you find an efficient position for pushing, if that's what you're looking for. Tell me more about what you're hoping for..." or "I want moms to be on the bed so I can monitor the baby. Some moms are propped up, some are lying down, or on their side."

Not all of those answers are based on evidence (baby can be monitored very nicely in a variety of positions, it just depends on care providers experience; episiotomies do not heal better), but at least the mother knows where the doctor or midwife stands on the issue and can make a real decision, ahead of time.

The best overall resource I've read about choosing a caregiver is in Henci Goer's The Thinking Woman's Guide to a Better Birth - she has a whole chapter to discuss options and questions to ask etc.

Two of my most popular posts also address choosing a care provider: Choosing a Care Provider & Birth Place and Pregnancy and Birth: What Are My Choices?.

Christina @ Birthing Your Baby
Independent Childbirth Classes for Central Maine

Labels: ,

posted by Christina Kennedy at 0 Comments

Saturday, September 27, 2008

Mother-Friendly Childbirth

What is mother-friendly childbirth?

Coalition for Improving Maternity Services (CIMS) offers several excellent articles on mother-friendly care:

The Mother-Friendly Childbirth Initiative outlines the principles of mother-friendly care. I highly recommend reading the two-page pdf, but these are the principles it highlights:
Normalcy of the Birth Process;
Empowerment;
Autonomy;
Do No Harm;
Responsibility.
Highlights of the Evidence is another two-page pdf that presents the evidence in very straight-forward, easy-to-read language.

***************************************

There are so many aspects of mother-friendly care that it's hard to pick one to focus on... To me, mother friendly care is…
• care that considers mother & baby together; what’s good for mother is good for baby.

• care that honors birth as the birth of a mother & family; as an opportunity to empower mothers as they begin their parenting journey.

• care that values mothers, encouraging and supporting them as partners…
But, I think one of the most significant things about mother-friendly care is that it is PERSONALIZED care.

What is “friendly” to one mother may be confusing, overwhelming, or aggravating to another.

For example, in my childbirth classes, we practice contractions holding ice. For the first practice scenario, everyone complains and moans and giggles about how uncomfortable they are. For the second practice, everyone focuses inward and listens to their breathing. The focused breathing practice goes by much faster, and is much less uncomfortable for most people; however, for others, all the distraction of people talking moves time faster. These practice contractions help them realize something about themselves: they might benefit from a big crowd of friends and family supporting & encouraging them during labor; for others, they think about having a quiet, cave where nothing is distracting them from their coping internally.

The point is, what is friendly to one person – no talking, or lots of talking – might not work at all for someone else. Or – it might work better one way for part of labor, and another way later.

Our friends know us. They listen to us. They treat us as individuals.

They know our history & our beliefs…
They know how we are trying to live and they support us…

Mother-friendly care comes from providers who take the time to listen to mothers, to learn about each mother’s history, what she believes about birth…

Does this mother love the water?
Is she anxious about needles?

Mother-friendly care comes from providers who take the time to consider how to best support each particular mother and baby on their birth journey…

Does she need a lot of step-by-step, close support, or would that distract her, pulling her out of her mammal instinctive brain?

…and who then follow-through, basing care decision on that particular mother & baby.

Finally, mother-friendly care is about trust. Friends can trust each other. Mothers should be able to trust that their caregivers will provide personalized care that is based on the best evidence, not on legalities and convenience; that the hospitals and birth centers where they give birth are crafting policies to support and encourage mother-friendly caregiving. With homebirths, families get to make up their own rules, with the guidance of their midwife!

Do I think that’s where we’re at, now, in Central Maine? Where most women give birth in places that support mother-friendly caregivers; that the nurses, doctors, and midwives are mother-friendly?

Sometimes, yes, but (so sadly) I do not think it is the norm here, or in the USA as a whole. Like many people, I struggle with this - how to be an active agent for change? how to encourage others to request (or to insist on!) this type of care? how to show them that they, and their babies, deserve it?

I went to see Birth last night in Gardiner - it was amazing, awesome, sad, beautiful, empowering. I wish the theater had been packed - it wasn't. I wish people had brought their teenage daughters (and sons) to continue an ongoing discussion with them about birth. I wish couples thinking about trying to conceive had come, to open/continue their discussions about the birth of their family. Not that the conversation afterwards wasn't fun and interesting; it was to me - it just would have been even more wonderful if it had reacher a broader segment of the population.

Christina @ Birthing Your Baby
Independent Childbirth Classes for Central Maine

Labels: , ,

posted by Christina Kennedy at 0 Comments

Friday, September 19, 2008

The Other Side of the Glass

I watched a very, very powerful film trailer, called The Other Side of the Glass, the other day and I want to invite you to view it too. You can also view it directly from Janel's (the film's writer/producer) blog, along with information on how to purchase the extended trailer and her story of making the film so far. I just purchased the extended trailer myself & can't wait to view it - and offer it as a resource for my clients.

This trailer is about dads and moms and babies: how babies are thinking, feeling creatures from the time of birth (and before), and as such, deserve dignity and respect during the birthing process; how dads can be guardians of the birth space, for mom and baby; how birth is now and how it could be.

I've noticed that families who are expecting their first baby sometimes have a certain attitude about experiences they see or hear that challenge the decisions they're making for their baby's birth: this _____________ won't happen to me. It happens to other people, but it won't happen to me because ___________________.
**I** won't be one of the women who have a cesarean for failure-to-progress (the reason for 40% of primary cesareans).

**MY baby** will stay with me for skin-to-skin bonding after the birth (according to the Listening to Mothers II report, 39% left their mother's arms during the first hour for "routine, non-urgent care").

**MY hospital/doctor/midwife** will treat me like an individual, offering care specific to my body, my baby and my birth.
Turns out that many caregivers and hospitals have certain routines (routine IV, routine continuous electronic fetal monitoring, routine epidural), and they have varying degrees of willingness to deviate from that routine. According to the Listening to Mothers II report, "Each of the following interventions was experienced by most mothers: continuous electronic fetal monitoring, one or more vaginal exams, intravenous drip, epidural or spinal analgesia, and urinary catheter."

There are certainly doctors, midwives, and hospitals who encourage women to participate in their care, and who treat women and their babies as individuals, with respect and dignity and patience. But, unfortunately, not all do. Even if you personally like your provider, or he/she is "terrific" accoring to your friends, or if he/she is the closest, or has rights at the newly remodeled hospital birth center: none of these things guarantee that dignity, respect, patience and/or treatment as an individual. According to the Listening to Mothers Survey II, 26% of women chose a care provider on family/friend recommendation; 26% for its nearby location; 47% because of their insurance plan. Only 18% chose a care provider because (s)he was a good match with the mother's philosophy.

I encourage (implore?) moms and their partners to remove any blinders and truly investigate whether or not the provider/birth place that they've chosen truly fits their needs. Ask challenging questions! Ask yourself, each other, your care provider(s), your hospital/birth center. Assuming (hoping?) that it won't be you, or your partner, or your baby has nothing like the impact of asking questions, communicating preferences, doing the research, and making informed decisions. Nothing guarantees a perfect birth experience, but doing this kind of work ahead of time has obvious advantages for moms, dads, and babies!

Wondering where to get started? I wrote two posts that directly address these issues, both full of book and website recommendations that might help: "Pregnancy and Birth: What Are My Choices" and "Choosing a Care Provider and Birth Place".

Other resources to check out, especially for partners: book review on Don't Just Stand There, and one of the best books for moms & their partners: Penny Simkin's The Birth Partner. Pam England's book Birthing From Within also has some good suggestions specifically for dads and birth support people, as well as some thoughtful & practical information for dads on her website.

Good luck on the journey!

Christina @ Birthing Your Baby
Independent Childbirth Classes for Central Maine

Labels: , , , ,

posted by Christina Kennedy at 1 Comments

Saturday, September 13, 2008

Bonding after Cesarean Birth in the News

I read Tara Parker-Pope's most recent blog entry in the Health section of the New York Times, "Delivery Method Affects Brain Response to Baby's Cry" last week and I've been thinking about it ever since.

Pope opens with some personal experience, explaining that her feelings of "being numb" and "uninvolved" with her daughter's Cesarean birth surprised her, and that "When I finally heard a baby cry, it took a minute for me to realize that the sound belonged to my own baby."

She goes on to summarize the study:
"That’s why I was particularly interested to read of new research showing that the method of delivery seems to influence how a mother’s brain responds to the cries of her own baby. The brains of women who have natural childbirth appear to be more responsive to the cries of their own babies, compared to the brains of women who have C-section births . . . The study, published in The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, found that the cry of a woman’s own baby triggered significant responses in several parts of the brain related to sensory processing, empathy, arousal, motivation, reward and habit-regulation"
(I'm going to interrupt myself here to say that I hate it when people euphemize "vaginal birth" with "natural birth" - is the word vagina that threatening? because to me, and to lots of other people, natural birth is not the same as, or interchangeable with, vaginal birth. A vaginal birth could have been induced with cytotec (to soften the cervix) and pitocin (to stimulate contractions); the amniotic membranes could have been artificially ruptured; the mother could have been hooked up to an IV (with the Pitocin drip) and an epidural and a catheter; baby could be removed with a vacuum extractor. Does all this result in a vaginal birth? Yes, certainly! But is that a "natural" birth?? I'm not sure how all those medications and procedures equal "natural", even in the loosest sense of the word. And when doctors and/or scientists, and those who report their findings, start choosing not to distinguish between the two, that's when we're in real trouble - see VBAC link below...).

Anyway! Here are two links to a summary of the study: "Maternal brain response to own baby-cry is affected by cesarean section delivery". I like this summary because it reports that this study was done on a sample size of (only!!) TWELVE women - six who "delivered vaginally" and six who elected for a Cesarean birth; and "Natural childbirth makes mothers more responsive to own baby-cry", which I think summarizes the study in easier to understand language, though they do make that pesky trick of making "vaginal" into "natural" in their title (!!).

Another blogger, who writes about oxytocin (the "hormone of luuuuuvv" is what I call it in class), has this blog entry about the study.

Reading that study made me think back to something that I read (or heard?) about monkeys who reject their babies born by Cesarean. After a little searching, I found out that the reknowned French obstetrician has a very interesting website called WombEcology. In one terrific article, "In-labor Physiolocial Reference", he reminds us that humans are mammals, and that we give birth as mammals. He describes the handicaps that are special to human mothers giving birth, and how we can help minimize them. It's really a terrific article - much better than the title makes it sound - go read it!

One thing he highlights in the article is that:
"Physiologists constantly refer to what they learn from non-human mammals. This leads to keep in mind the main differences between human beings and other species. One of the main differences is that the effects of a disturbed birth process on maternal behaviour are much more evident at an individual level among non-human mammals . . .

Today caesareans are common in veterinary medicine, particularly among dogs. This is possible as long as human beings compensate for a frequently inadequate maternal behaviour, assist the process of nursing and provide, if necessary, commercial canine milk replacers. The effects of a caesarean on the maternal behaviour of primates are well documented, because several species of monkeys are used as laboratory animals. This is the case of the ‘crab-eating macaques’ and the rhesus monkeys.(3) In these species the mothers do not take care of their baby after a caesarean; laboratory personnel must spread vaginal secretions on the baby’s body in order to try to induce the mother’s interest for her newborn.

We don’t need to multiply the examples of animal experiments and observations by veterinarians and primate-using scientists to convince anyone that a caesarean – or just the anaesthesia that is necessary for the operation – can dramatically alter the maternal behaviour of mammals in general. In this regard humans are special. Millions of women all over the world have taken care of their baby after a caesarean birth or simply an epidural birth or a ‘twilight sleep birth’.

We know why the behaviour of humans is more complex and more difficult to interpret than the behaviour of other mammals, including primates.(4) Human beings have developed sophisticated ways to communicate. They speak. They create cultures. Their behaviour is less directly influenced by their hormonal balance and more directly by the cultural milieu. When a woman knows that she is expecting a baby, she can anticipate displaying some maternal behaviour. This does not mean that we cannot learn from non-human mammals. The spectacular and immediate behavioural responses of animals indicate the questions we should raise about ourselves."
The reason I include this excerpt is because I think that for some women, feelings of distance, or not feeling immediately "bonded" to her baby, become one more thing that she feels guilt or shame about. I think it's critical to realize that bonding happens over time, and that we as humans can overcome a less-than-optimal beginning. I think the truth - that feelings of distance can be a part of some women's postpartum experience - gets covered up, which can make women feel alone and also make it very hard to find resources for help.

If we realized, accepted, and publicized as part of informed consent that epidural anesthesia and/or Cesarean birth can have a physiological impact on bonding and post-partum blues/depression, women could make more informed decisions about their care and could prepare in one of the many ways (extra support, more skin-to-skin contact with baby, and massage come immediately to mind) that are shown to promote bonding and lessen post-partum blues.

If any of this gets you wondering about choices for VBAC (vaginal birth after cesarean), or the safety of VBAC, I came across a great article on the Midwifery Today website, Homebirth after Cesarean: The Myth and the Reality (see also if you're interested in how equating vaginal birth with natural birth as affected hospital policies on VBACs).

You can also visit the Online Resources section of my site for links to VBAC.com and ICAN (International Cesarean Awareness Network), as well as lots of links to postpartum depression and support sites.

Christina @ Birthing Your Baby
Independent Childbirth Classes for Central Maine

Labels: , , , ,

posted by Christina Kennedy at 1 Comments

Friday, August 22, 2008

Questioning Safety: Hospital, Birth Center, and Homebirth

Where is it safe to birth your baby? Is the hospital the safest option? The only safe option? Are planned homebirths safe? Is it safer to have an OB/GYN (obstetrician, who is a doctor) as a care provider, or are CNMs (certified nurse midwife) and CPMs (certified professional midwife) safe options too?

First, I want to share a quote by Harriette Hartigan (midwife/photographer) that is commonly heard in the birthing community, "Birth is as safe as life gets". I wonder what the context of this quote originally was... to me, it suggests several important ideas:
  • Birth is a part of life. This is easy to forget when, in our culture, birth is so removed from life - usually taking place in the hospital, with only the birthing mother, her partner and maybe a female friend or relative. Very, very few of the pregnant mamas who take my classes have ever seen a real birth - human or animal. Contrast that experience with the one pictured below, where you can see birth really is a part of life:



  • While birth is safe, there are no guarantees. And that, I think, is the hardest thing. We've all heard horror stories, and I feel no need to put additional details in people's heads. Thankfully, in our country, most births conclude with a healthy mother and healthy baby (not that there isn't room for improvement!). But there are times, so sadly, when despite careful attention to mother and baby, something goes wrong. Sometimes with a warning, sometimes not. Even sometimes when the mother has had excellent prenatal care, an uncomplicated pregnancy, and highly qualified, experienced birth attendants. As sad as that is - it's life. People die. The struggle is to avoid medicalizing the experience of so many motherbabies in the name of preventing one or two deaths. Because doing that - continuous fetal monitoring, or not laboring at all and giving birth via a cesarean at 39 weeks - actually carries many, many more risks for mothers and babies, as well as the health of their future children. The struggle is to avoid lawsuits where something bad happens despite excellent care. This tendency has had the unfortunate effect of justifying doctors who practice defensive medicine: monitoring continuously for the paper trail, and the many cesareans that happen "just in case", because doctors know they will be sued over the cesarean they didn't do, not the one they did.

  • Choices we make can make birth safer. I wear my seat belt, and buckle my kids into booster seats. We wear life jackets. We get consistent check-ups by experienced, well-trained care providers. We eat lots of fruits and vegetables and whole grains etc. & etc. & etc. My husband and I make choices for ourselves, and for our children, that - to the best of our knowledge - enhance and protect our healthy bodies. Women can make choices for their birth experience that enhance and protect their bodies and their babies.

    One last point - while I wear a seat belt, I do still drive a car. I know that accidents happen, but that doesn't change my decision to drive on a daily basis. While I try to minimize the chance that something catastrophic happens while we're in the car, I understand that driving safely, while I'm not too tired, in a safe vehicle that gets routine maintenance, doesn't completely protect me. There are things that happen where no blame can be assigned - they just happen.
  • I believe birth is very similar to driving a car. Safe most of the time, even when people don't make the best choices; safest, but not perfectly safe, when they do. So, back to the original questions: where, and with whom, is it safe to give birth?

    Book after book that I've read reassures that quality care in a well-prepared home or quality birth center is as safe if not safer than a hospital birth attended by a doctor. Here are some excerpts that I found particularly helpful:

    From the Sears' Birth Book on birth center births, "In 1989 the New England Journal of Medicine reported a study of nearly twelve thousand women admitted for labor and delivery to eight-four free-standing birth centers in the United States. The study concluded that birth centers offer a safe and acceptable alternative to hospital births for low-risk women. The cesarean-section rate for the women in the study was 4.4 percent, far below the national average. There were no maternal deaths, and the neonatal death rate was well below average" (Sears 42). To find a birth center near you (as well as lots of other great information), check out American Association of Birth Centers . For questions to ask and things to think about, visit Childbirth Connections "Tips and Tools for Choosing a Place of Birth" page.

    While discussing homebirth, the Sears' write: "In 1900 fewer than 5 percent of births took place in hospitals. This increased to 75 percent by 1936, and by 1970 approximately 99 percent of mothers delivered in hospitals. But is this progress? Illustrating the differing perceptions of home birthing are these two mothers discussing their birth choices: 'You are brave to have a home birth,' said a concerned mother. 'You are brave to have a hospital birth,' replied the other" (43). They go on to discuss the safety of home births this way, "both sides of statistics to support their view. The people in white coats boast that the chances of a mother dying in childbirth was much higher in 1935 than in 1980, and that this is the result of technology available only in the hospital. Home-birth supporters argue that there is no reason to believe that there is a cause-and-effect relationship between birth in the hospital and lower mortality rates. Today's women have better access to prenatal care and more is known about safe birthing. Antibiotics are available to treat infections, and most aspects of health are better now than they used to be. Hospitals actually have higher mortality rates than home births, in part because mothers with the highest risk of life-threatening medical problems deliver in hospitals. Statistics that show poor outcomes in home births are equally misleading since these studies lump all out-of-hospital births together, whether they're planned, properly attended home births or involve foolhardy couples with no prenatal care doing it on their own [or happen by accident, at home or en route, mom has the baby earlier than anticipated]" (46).

    The more recently published book, Having a Baby Naturally, comes to similar conclusions. O'Mara asks "Which birth environment is safest? Surprisingly, home births, birthing in birthing centers, and hospital births are equally safe. Recent studies show definitively that there is no improvement in outcome, for mother or baby, in hospital births as compared to those that happen at home or in a birthing center . . . in fact, there is an indication that outcome is actually slightly better in low-risk births out of the hospital" (34). She goes on to explain that "home births, and births in birthing centers, have enjoyed a recent renaissance in the United States. However, there is still a lingering societal question about the safety of such births, and most women continue to go to the maternity ward of the hospital where their caregiver practices. Choosing to do something different may take real courage, as friends and relatives may be particularly concerned about the safety of your choice" (35).

    There is a great website that offers answers to many of the "What if" questions friends and family might ask. It does have some loud music that accompanies it, but if it bothers you, just mute it.

    The Home Birth Reference Site has some terrific information too, on the safety of homebirth, as well as home birth stories, reasons why people homebirth, how to plan a homebirth, more answers to "what if?" questions and other useful information. The North Carolina Homebirth website provides additional information on why homebirth, how to plan and prepare, and more birth stories.

    A few additional links include:
  • Citizens for Midwifery document comparing WHO recommendations, CIMS suggestions, and the reality of birth in the US as of 2004.

  • An article by Pam England (Birthing From Within), "No Place Like Home".

  • Childbirth Connections offers excellent information about the different care provider options, as well as information on questions to ask yourself in making a choice, and questions to ask during the interview process.
  • Finally, I want to mention that the United States is not the standard-bearer for safety for mothers and babies. Using 2008 statistics, the United States (6.3/1000) currently ranks BEHIND the following countries for infant mortality rates: South Korea (5.94/1000), Cuba, Isle of Man, Italy, Taiwan, San Marino, Greece, Monaco, Ireland, Canada, Jersey, New Zealand, United Kingdom, Gibraltar, Portugal, Netherlands, Luxembourg, Guernsey, Liechtenstein, Australia, Belgium, Austria, Denmark, Slovenia, Macau, Isreal, Spain, Switzerland, Andorra, Germany, Czech Republic, Malta, Norway, Anguilla, Finland, France, Iceland, Hong Kong, Japan, Sweden, and Singapore (2.3/1000).

    There is something many (but not all) of these other countries have in common: universal access to prenatal care, and more support and use of midwives and out-of-hospital births.

    Marsden Wagner's book Born in the USA offers some interesting critiques and comparisons of care in the US vs. care in other developed countries. He writes, "Whenever I discuss home birth with obstetricians in the United Sates, I need only ask, 'What about the Netherlands?' to see their faces fall. The Netherlands has a long tradition of planned home birth. As recently as thirty years ago, half of all births in the Netherlands were planned home births. The percentage fell to one-third in the 1980s, but the rate has been climbing for the last ten years and is now more than one-third - 36 percent. The Dutch do not have significantly more women and babies dying around the time of birth than other Western European countries, and they have lower mortality rates than the United States does" (144).

    Later he also discuss birth in Denmark: "Denmark also guarantees a choice of place of birth to all Danish families. Like every other highly industrialized country except the United States, Denmark also has a national health care system. In Denmark, midwives attend all low-risk births either in the hospital or in the family's home . . . The home birth rate varies within Denmark (it is around 10 percent of all births in some districts), and Denmark's mortality rates for birthing women and newborn babies are among the lowest in the world" (193).

    Wagner also explains that "In some areas of Western Europe and Scandinavia, a low-risk pregnant woman can choose a small group of midwives who share a practice. The woman will usually get to know all of the midwives during prenatal visits over the course of her pregnancy, and when she goes into labor, one of them will come to the home or hospital and assist for the entire time, even if the labor is thirty-six hours long. This allows the woman to receive one-on-one continuous care with a known midwife - so this scientifically proven ideal scenario is not pie in the sky, but quite feasible. All those countries in Western Europe and Scandinavia where midwives handle prenatal and birth care for low-risk women exclusively have lower mortality rates for birthing women and their babies than the United States does" (198).

    He goes on to use a few more examples - "a resurgence of birth houses in Japan began [after the Americans left post-World War II], and more and more midwives are leaving hospital practice to work as community midwives in birth houses. This Japanese experience confirms what we have seen in the United States, that in the end, attempts to eradicate midwifery are not successful. In every society, there will always be midwives working to maintain women's freedom to control their own reproductive lives, and there will always be women who will avail themselves of midwifery services" (199).

    And, "In New Zealand, the maternity system is similar to Scandinavia's, but a woman having a low-risk pregnancy can choose either a midwife or a family physician to provide her prenatal and birth care" (Wagner 199).

    Each of these countries have significantly better outcomes for babies: New Zealand (4.99/1000), Netherlands (4.81/1000), Denmark (4.40/1000), Japan (ranked third, at 2.80/1000), and Sweden (ranked second, at 2.75/1000).

    Another famous champion of birth, Barbara Katz-Rothman, explains that "Birth is not only about making babies. Birth is about making mothers - strong, competent, capable mothers who trust themselves and know their inner strength." Safety concerns should not limit women's options for where they give birth, and with whom. Women should be able to choose the options that feel safest to them - hospital or birth center or homebirth, obstetrician, family physician, or midwife. All care providers should encourage women to trust themselves, to participate in decision-making, and treat each birthing motherbaby as individuals. Your baby has only one birth experience; you will probably only have one or a few birth experiences - and each one is an amazing opportunity for growth and joy.

    There's a quote in Our Bodies, Ourselves For the New Century that I share with my clients: “When women go to caregivers for checkups, they should walk out from every visit feeling ten feet tall. Every site of care and style of care, no matter who gives it, ought not only give surveillance but should educate and empower, should enhance every woman’s feeling of ability to do what she’s doing well” (451). That sums it up beautifully for me, and I hope this blog entry helps you explore the options for care that surround you so that you enjoy education and empowerment on your journey to motherhood.

    Christina @ Birthing Your Baby
    Independent Childbirth Classes for Central Maine

    Labels: , , ,

    posted by Christina Kennedy at 0 Comments

    Thursday, August 14, 2008

    Choosing a Care Provider & Birth Place

    In many parts of the United States, women can choose between a hospital birth, a birth center birth, or a homebirth; they can choose an OB doctor (obstetrician), a FP doctor (family practice), a CNM (certified nurse midwife) or CPM (certified professional midwife). Different states have a variety of legal options, and even in the states where homebirth isn't explicitly legal (or is explicitly illegal) there are "underground" networks of midwives. To find out more about the status of midwifery in your state, visit the Midwives Alliance of North America (MANA) chart.

    In Maine, there is currently one birth center, The Birth House, located in Bridgton, and run by Birthwise Midwifery. To find a birth center outside of Maine, try searching the American Association of Birth Centers Find a Birthcenter page - though there may be a birth center in your area that is not accredited.

    There are also quite a few CPMs who attend homebirths in Maine. For more information on finding a midwife to attend your homebirth, you can visit the Birthing Your Baby Local Resources page or the Midwives of Maine site. To find a CNM for a hospital birth, visit the Find a Midwife section of the American College of Nurse-Midwives website.

    If you're interested in learning more about your options, there are lots of websites and books to help you explore.

    BOOKS

    The Birth Book(1994), by William Sears, M.D., and Martha Sears, R.N.
    The Sears' dedicate a whole chapter, "Choices in Childbirth" to discuss the many options that are available to birthing women. There is in-depth information about choosing a birth team (who your care providers will be), questions to ask during the interview process, choosing labor-support, choosing a birth place, and choosing childbirth education classes.

    I especially like their "Sample Prenatal Interview List":

    "While quizzing your prospective doctor [or any care provider], be sure you know where he or she stands on these important topics:
  • labor management
  • pain management
  • natural childbirth
  • walking during labor
  • improvising various labor and birth positions
  • electronic fetal monitoring: continuous, intermittent, telemetry, none
  • labor-support persons: professional assistant, baby's father
  • episiotomy: how often performed, alternatives
  • forceps and vacuum extractors
  • birth plans
  • criteria for cesarean birth
  • vaginal birth after cesarean
  • use of water during labor [or birth]
  • epidural anesthesia
  • childbirth classes
  • pregnancy health: exercise, nutrition, weight gain, etc.
  • hospital affiliations
  • routine prenatal screening tests
  • call schedule (group or solo practice; birth philosophy of covering [providers])
  • vacation schedule (in case it's during your due date)
  • fees, insurance plans (usually handled by office staff)
  • What would birth look like in this country if most women asked some questions about their care providers philosophy before or during the first visit. What would happen, I wonder, if women no longer accepted vague reassurances when they asked about cesarean birth rates? What would happen if women flocked to care providers who allowed eating and drinking, who encouraged women to give birth in a position that was comfortable for her, even if it was not on the bed, even if it was in a tub!

    The reality, though, is that, right now, most women do not ask questions about the routine care practices of their care providers. It's not that there are wrong answers (well, vague or misleading or dishonest answers are wrong) - the philosophies of the birthing woman/family and the care provider either match, or they don't. But if a woman doesn't find out until the birth that the hospital's routine care involves an IV, and the care provider will harass her if she doesn't submit to one, or that the care provider does not believe that a natural tear is better than an episiotomy and so routinely preps and performs them, even when a woman states that she does not want one - that's too late to make a change, obviously.

    Unfortunately, I'm not exaggerating. I had a client who was really afraid of needles, and was very concerned about a routine IV. She didn't want one unless absolutely necessary. I encouraged her to ask her care provider what her options were regarding an IV, given her personal fear of needles. My client had the conversation with her care provider, who said - "If you don't have an IV, your baby might DIE!!" and who went on to explain how important she believed a routine IV is to the care of mothers and babies. My client was horrified by the scare tactics used by the care provider, and since she found out in plenty of time (second trimester) that her philosophies didn't match her care provider's, she changed practices (yay for her!).

    Another key point in the Sears' list is knowing the call schedule of your provider. So many of my clients are surprised to hear that the providers in the office alternate - if there are four providers on a call schedule, a birthing woman has a 25% chance of being cared for by her primary care provider during her birth. There are ways to make this more palatable, by meeting all the care providers in the practice, and knowing that they have similar philosophies about routine care, for example. But here's another personal example - my sister in PA went to a well-known OB/CNM practice, who asked women to meet all the possible care providers who might attend the birth - there were something like ten. So much for continuity of care! Yes, she had a ten-minute appointment with each provider, but did she really get to know any of them? No. For her second baby, she went to a birth center - for that reason and many others.

    Another section in the Sears' chapter on choices that I really appreciated personally was their discussion of in-hospital vs. out-of-hospital classes. Here's part of it:
    "Ideally, schools should prepare students for the real world in a variety of circumstances. In-hospital classes prepare you for the birth policies of that hospital. On the other hand, out-of-hospital classes have the advantage of describing a variety of birth choices so that you can prepare for the birth you want - but one that the hospital may not be willing to deliver. Ideally, birth place, birth attendant, and childbirth educator should all share the same birth philosophy, but where this is not the case, a good childbirth class should help you understand your doctor better and enable you to work with him or her and the hospital staff to achieve a birth that is safe and satisfying. Look for an instructor who emphasizes flexibility and good communication between parents and professionals" (51-52).
    Sometimes people wonder why I don't teach for a hospital, or why anyone would need or want to take a class that wasn't provided by the hospital. I like the freedom to teach what I believe is most important; I like to teach about making informed choices, and encourage my clients to think of themselves as consumers, not as "patients". I think there is value to being outside of "the system", free from any influence other than my clients' best interest. My philosophy isn't that all women should give birth one way, or another - instead, I encourage mothers/partners to think about what they want in the birth experience, and to communicate with their care providers. Birth is a once in a lifetime experience - even if a woman has several babies - each birth is that baby's only birth. I do encourage flexibility; though we talk about birth plans, we also talk about living in the moment and doing "the next best thing" if the first best thing doesn't work out, which we all know sometimes happens. Birth is a part of life! Plus, I have small classes (one to four couples), I can work my schedule to accommodate people who call me a month before they're due, or who work at night, etc., and I offer unlimited telephone and email support. It's a good deal for everyone!

    Anyway, back to resources... Next up is Mothering Magazine's Having A Baby, Naturally (2003), by Peggy O'Mara. She also offers an entire chapter on "Making Birth Choices - Choosing Your Place of Birth and Your Birth Attendant". O'Mara lists "reasons to choose" and "reasons not to choose" to birth at home, a freestanding birth center, or at a teaching/large hospital; she also mentions a few other choices like smaller hospitals, alternative birth centers within hospitals, and water birth. There is an explanation of the typical care provided by midwives, obstetricians, and family physicians.

    O'Mara offers several considerations at the beginning of the chapter to help families assess which birth setting might work best for them, including information on safety and cost. She goes on to write:
    "A more important 'cost' to assess, however, has to do with the effects that birth trauma and general hospital-style treatment have on the bonding between a mother and her child. High levels of stress incurred in hospital settings can seriously affect a parent's ability to function well in the difficult weeks after birth. Many women agonize about their negative birthing experiences, including unnecessary interventions and unkind or patronizing treatment, for months or even years after birth. Since birth sets the stage for your early parenting experiences, it makes sense to avoid anything that increases stress for you or reduces your ability to bond with your child. Making a decision on where your baby's birth will take place is second in importance only in making the decision to become parents in the first place! Take time to explore all the options you have" (35).
    The "Which One is Best for Me?" list of considerations is also helpful:
    "There is no formula that can help a mother-to-be decide what type of care provider will be best for her. That is because every provider is different, even within such different categories as 'obstetrician' and 'midwife.' Some obstetricians are very open to the idea of a birth with minimal or no interventions [like my daughter's birth, born after minimal procedures while I squatted on a birth stool, the OB hovering to play catch on the floor - it was great!]. Some midwives may practice in hospitals and be much more likely to rely on technology than others [my sister, who had her membranes sweeped, water broken, Pitocin, Nubain etc. & etc. had a "medwife" - a medically-minded midwife].

    For this reason, it is necessary to interview several candidates before making a final decision. It also helps to know that no decision is absolutely final. While it may not be ideal to change birth attendants midstream, it is better than working with someone you find you are unhappy with. To decide who to interview, consider these points:

  • Check to see if this person is able or willing to attend a birth in the location you have chosen. Most doctors will not attend home births, so this will narrow your field automatically.
  • If you want an attendant who will be with you throughout most of your labor, you should consider using a midwife. Obstetricians will generally only be with you during the final stages of labor, checking on you intermittently beforehand. You will be attended to by labor nurses for the most part.
  • Know that midwives spend significantly longer on regular checkups than most doctors do, from twenty to forty minutes per visit. Again, there are always exceptions to this.
  • Cesarean section rates, on average, are much lower for midwives than for medical doctors. In addition, rates of successful VBACs (vaginal births after a cesarean) are better for midwives. Certified nurse-midwives, for example, have a rate of 11.6 percent for C-sections and 68.9percent for successful VBACs. The national average is, respectively, 23.3 percent and 24.9 percent [much higher national average C-section rate now, hovering around a third of all births].
  • Choosing a male ob/gyn, rather than a female increases your chance of ending up with a cesarean section by 40 percent.
  • Using a family practice physician can be advantageous if this is a person who is already very familiar with you and your family. Perhaps this will be the same person who is going to care for your newborn" (42-43).
  • Finally, O'Mara suggests questions to ask during the interview process, and some pointers on how to communicate effectively with your care provider.

    Another great book resource is Henci Goer's The Thinking Woman's Guide to a Better Birth (1999). She includes three separate chapters on choices for care during pregnancy and birth, "Professional Labor Support: Mothering the Mother", "Obstetricians, Midwives, and Family Practitioners: Someone to Watch Over You" and "The Place of Birth: Location, Location, Location". There is some very solid information in these chapters, including interview questions, lots of lists of pros/cons, some advice on what to do when provider choice is limited, either by insurance or by medical conditions or mother's location, a thorough comparison of birth sites that is really terrific, and more.

    There are some great "reality checks" throughout these chapters, including the following in the labor support chapter: "If you are a first-time mom planning a hospital birth, you're probably assuming that your nurse will shepherd you and your partner through labor. Ever-present, she will comfort and ten you. I suppose it happens occasionally, but not often. Studies show that the average labor and delivery nurse spends fifteen minutes of her eight-hour shift [italics mine] offering physical comfort measures, providing emotional support, or advocating for her patients. Another study showed that time with laboring women didn't increase even with a group of nurses who acknowledged the importance of labor support and when that was the study's intent. Meanwhile, with staff cutbacks the order of the day, even the best-intentioned nurse has not time to labor-sit" (177).

    Hopefully you have not heard responses like the ones listed below from your caregiver. If you have, Henci Goer suggests, “these behaviors will tell you that you have the wrong person, someone who wants to coerce rather than convince you” (196). Here are the “red flags” listed in The Thinking Woman’s Guide to a Better Birth:
    • Scare tactics. “We can do that – if you don’t care what happens to the baby.” “Which would you rather have: a nice experience or a healthy baby?” You can have both. In fact, the things that make a nice experience also make for a healthy baby.
    • Anger. “And where did you go to medical school?” “I can’t take care of you if you don’t trust me.” Of course you should trust your caregiver, but the trust must be earned.
    • Ridiculing your concerns, desires, opinions, or competency to participate in decisions about your care. “I see you’ve been reading those women’s magazines.” “You want natural childbirth? I think that makes about as much sense as natural dentistry.”
    • Patronizing you. “Don’t worry about a thing; just leave everything to me.”
    • Vagueness. It’s a bad sign when you can’t pin a caregiver down enough to get at least ballpark estimates of personal statistics such as cesarean rates . . . It’s also bad when the caregiver says you can do anything you want during labor and won’t specify what situations might preclude that" (196-197).
    Finally, there are some great suggestions regarding choices for provider and location in The Big Book of Birth (2007) by Erica Lyon, who was the education coordinator and administrative supervisor at the Elizabeth Seton Chilbearing Center in NYC. A few of suggestions in this chapter include:
  • "Check if your practitioner's belief system matches yours. There is a range of how practitioners 'manage' or 'care for' women, from authoritarian to nurturing, of how available and accessible they are. Most of us know whether we want someone more authoritarian who can tell us what will happen [debatable, I think, if anyone can tell us for sure what's going to happen, other than a baby is going to come out, some way or another!] and what to do when we're birthing our baby, or someone who is more nurturing and gives us more personal responsibility. Asking questions to gauge if this is a good match so that you are relaxed and feel you can trust your practitioner in labor is very important . . . If you think your practitioner is eroding your confidence, causing unnecessary concer, or looking for problems where they don't exist, then changing may be a good course of action" (269).
  • "Think outside the bassinet. By this I mean look at models of care around the world that get good (better than the U.S.) outcomes and try to model your care after that [planning to discuss this in my next post]" (270).
  • Stop reading What to Expect When You're Expecting, or any book that has headlines like "Warning" or "Danger". The anxiety such a book produces is not helpful . . . to normal pregnancy and produces a lot of unnecessary guilt and concern [time enough for that after the baby is born & you're parenting - hahah!]. No one can tell you what to expect, only the various paths and options and how all of these can be relative at times" (270).
  • "Take a moment and be honest about your concerns and fears. Understanding our emotions and psychology does not necessarily give us more control over a situation but it does help us cope and identify what we truly need" (271). This is so important! I ask all my moms to ask themselves "What is most important thing your care provider could do during the birth to help you?" and they think for a minute and come up with an answer. Then I ask - "Have you talked to him/her about this?" and as of yet, every single mother has said, why no, I haven't. So there it is: care providers cannot read minds. And sometimes, we ourselves aren't sure what is most important if we haven't taken some time to think about it; only after the fact can we identify something that could have been done differently to improve our experience. So, I encourage women to do a lot of reflecting themselves, and then have some honest conversations with their partners and their care providers about the kind of care and support they want for the birth!
  • And the last one I'll mention from this terrific section, "Give some thought about what might make this more manageable for you. In which areas do you need reassurance? . . . Labor and birth are challenging no matter how we do it, but what can you put in place for yourself that will give you confidence and help you go through it . . . When we take care of the mother, we take care of the baby. (The baby is still part of us at this point!) As I write this, I can hear the 'reactive' voice to this statement: 'How selfish! Labor is not about the woman, it's about a healthy baby!' Yes, at the end of the day absolutely true; however we women know that and we will make decision that help us cope and meet that objective. (To imply otherwise is a wee bit patronizing.) . . . with information and support, we move through labor knowing that we are doing what we have to, what we believe in, what we are capable of given all the variables - and that it is okay" (272).
  • Two other very interesting books about care during pregnancy and birth in the United States are Pushed: The Painful Truth about Childbirth and Modern Maternity Care by Jennifer Block and Born in the United States: How a Broken Maternity System Must be Fixed to Put Women and Children First, by Marsden Wagner. I'm sure there are other books that I'm not mentioning - if you're thinking of one that has helpful information on choosing a care provider or the birth place, please leave it in the comments!

    WEBSITES

    The excellent organization Childbirth Connection offers an entire section on Choosing a Caregiver, highlighting the importance of making an informed choice about, what the different care provider options are, and other insightful information. I appreciate that they also include reasons that are "insufficient" for choosing a caregiver:
    "It is not wise to select a caregiver solely because:
  • that person practices near your home or workplace — convenience is nice, but you may need to travel further to find the right person
  • you know someone who worked with that person — even if recommended by a friend or relative, you will want to be sure that a maternity caregiver's style will meet your needs and values and reflects the best available research
  • that person is a woman, or a man — if you have a preference for caregiver gender, you will want to be sure that that person's maternity philosophy and style of practice match well with your needs and values and with the best available research
  • that person has been your provider for well-woman or primary care — you will want to learn about that person's maternity philosophy and style of practice before making your decision."
  • The next pages offer information on midwives and obstetricians and family physicians, as well as "Best Evidence (a discussion of studies done about differences between midwifery and obtetric care)," "Tips & Tools" (interview questions, etc.), and "Resources" (links to helpful resources).

    Childbirth Connection offers a similar set of resources about Choosing a Place of Birth: a review of the options, best evidence, tips & tools, and resources.

    Childbirth Connection offers many more terrific resources, including an important free .pdf called The Rights of Childbearing Women, as well as a free .pdf download of the Listening to Mothers surveys (interesting to get a picture of what birth has been like in the United States for the past few years), and the amazing resource A Guide to Effective Care in Pregnancy and Childbirth - buy it on Amazon for a lot of money or read the sections that interest you here for free! A Guide to Effective Care "is an overview of results of the best available research about effects of specific maternity practices. The full text of the current edition (Oxford University Press, 2000) is available on this website [linked chapter by chapter] courtesy of the authors: Murray Enkin, Marc J.N.C. Keirse, James Neilson, Caroline Crowther, Lelia Duley, Ellen Hodnett and Justus Hofmeyr." I could keep highlighting useful information for their site like the pregnancy pictures and stages of pregnancy etc. & etc. but really, go check it out - amazing resources!

    Coalition for Improving Maternity Services (CIMS) has some useful downloads on its site, including information the Mother-Friendly Childbirth Initiative with links to "Evidence Basis for Mother-Friendly Care" and "Having a Baby? Ten Questions to Ask" and other helpful documents.

    UNICEF and WHO joined together to create the Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative, with an explanation of what a "Baby Friendly" label means, and a list of "Baby Friendly" hospitals and birth centers. In Maine, as of July 2008, we have Central Maine Medical Center in Lewiston, Maine General Medical Center in Augusta and Waterville, Miles Memorial Hospital in Damariscotta, and York Hospital, in York.

    Citizens for Midwifery offers a chart Ideals vs. Reality in U.S. Births, which compares the WHO recommendations, CIMS recommendations, and U.S. reality as of 2004.

    So that's my highlight of information that could help a mother (and her partner) choose the kind of care provider and birth setting that will work the best for them, as well as information on interviewing/choosing a specific provider and setting. The most important things to remember, in my opinion, are that you do have choices, and that the choices you make can have a very significant impact on your birth experience. If you're not happy with the care you're receiving or the setting you initially chose - please consider reviewing your options. One of the statements that is repeated over and over in all the books and sites I include in this entry is the importance of making choices about provider and setting that are right for you and your family as you get ready to meet the new little person growing inside of you.

    Happy exploring, and best wishes for making the best choice possible!

    Christina @ Birthing Your Baby
    Independent Childbirth Classes for Central Maine

    Labels: , , , ,

    posted by Christina Kennedy at 0 Comments

    Friday, August 8, 2008

    Pregnancy and Birth: What Are My Choices?

    I love birth stories. I've read lots of them, in various books* and online**. I've also heard a lot of stories from friends, relatives and strangers, as well as watched some on television, ranging from pure entertainment on sitcoms to "info-tainment" shows like Baby Story, to excellent documentaries***. Because of my passion for birth, I've searched for stories that are outside of the mainstream experience - natural birth stories, home birth stories, etc. When I was pregnant, I wanted to understand my full range of options, not just what "everyone else" does.

    Right now in the United States, there is a narrative that describes the birthing experience for a significant majority of women. It goes like this:

    "I thought I might be in labor... I was really excited! I called my doctor... contractions got stronger... went to the hospital... They settled me in bed with an IV and the fetal monitor... my contractions were really painful, so I asked for an epidural... the pain mostly disappeared, yay!... the nurse checked me and told me it was time to push, so I pushed lying on my back (or kind of propped up) and pushed some more! and then my baby was born!"

    According to the Listening to Mothers Survey II (2006):
  • 87% of women are attended by a doctor for their prenatal/birth care (obstetricians - 79%; family practice doctors - 8%)

  • 94% laboring/birthing women are monitored by the electronic fetal monitor, 93% of those continuously (76%) or most of the time (17%)

  • 86% laboring women used pain medication during labor: 76% spinal/epidural and 22% narcotic (Nubain, Stadol, Demerol), and

  • 92% of women push and give birth lying on their backs or propped up in a semi-sitting position.
  • Other common components of the "mainstream" birth story include:
  • 41% caregivers tried to induce labor, with an 84% success rate --> 34% births are inductions

  • 75% women stay in bed after they are admitted to the hospital, and

  • 80% have an IV.
  • This birth story works really well for some women, and not very well for others. It's the "normal" story - the one that most people tell, the one easiest to access over & over again. For example, TLC offers summaries upcoming "A Baby Story" episodes: in the first twenty, there is one mention of a midwife, one mention of a homebirth, three cesarean births, and many, many variations on "the" birth story I told above.

    But: this story isn't the only story! Birthing women do have other options. Other stories exist, showing women different possibilities:
  • 9% of women are attended by midwives for their prenatal/birth care

  • 3% use doulas for support during labor and birth

  • 1% birth at home or in a birth center

  • 3% are not attached to a fetal monitor, and had their baby's heartbeat monitored exclusively with a handheld device, and

  • 6% use a deep tub for pain relief.
  • These possibilities do not exist for women who are unaware of them. If a woman has never heard of giving birth at a birth center, that possibility does not exist for her. If she thinks that the only safe way to give birth is with a doctor in a hospital, she probably won't explore other options. If she has never read or heard people talking about a birth experience that did not involve medication, that possibility may not seem very real. As Diane Korte, author of A Good Birth, A Safe Birth explains it, "If I don't know my options, I don't have any."

    A helpful resource: Building Confidence, the free Lamaze newsletter, offers some useful perspectives in their Week 9 email about how to "Take Charge of Your Care".



    Where does a woman begin her exploration of options? Let's start with two of the biggest choices a pregnant woman has to make about her and her ba